Skip to main content

How NVIDIA plans to drive the adoption of autonomous cars


One of the biggest surprises at this year's Consumer Electronics Show was just how deep NVIDIA is getting into the automotive field. Given how reliant on armies of sensors the autonomous cars of the near future will be, however, it makes sense that the company best-known for its desktop computing power is at the forefront of transportation tech. We briefly spoke with the company's senior manager of automotive technology, David Anderson, about where he sees driver-less cars going, how long it'll take to get there and how the insurance industry might react once we do.

How far off are we from seeing this autonomous tech in a production model vehicle?

Last year we talked about the integration of K1 technology into Audi's Z-Fast programs. That represents the start to semi-autonomous and will lead to fully autonomous driving. The uptick of the technology is happening as we speak and literally everything we're doing, we're working with all the major automotive OEMs today engaged at some level or another of developmental research.

Ford and Volkswagen's moves to autonomous cars seem realistic and measured. Mercedes? Not so much.

Everybody has different ways of looking at that and a large part is it's sort of a corporate vision of the OEM that's guiding how fast it's going to move. I can only tell you that each of them approaches it differently and some of them are more aggressive than others in terms of how fast the tech is being integrated.

The interesting thing to remember in any of it is, regardless of how fast the auto OEMs move, it's the legal ramification and the legal liabilities associated with the infrastructure that ultimately will have to change to accept the technology -- that gates us more than anything. To be quite honest, we've got the building blocks in terms of what you see here to do it today, but the reality of it is the structure and infrastructure as a whole has to change.


If autonomous cars are totally safe, does insurance need to exist?

There are definitely some interesting paradigms that have to be looked through in terms of the execution of all that. I don't think anybody quite knows how that one's going to work out yet. One example to think about is insurance companies are embracing this technology of connected cars through the OBD2 port with customers uploading vehicle data for usage statistics.

You're talking about premium breaks based on driving habits, right?

Right. So that would be an example that says the acceptance of the technology might come faster because there's a ramifications for lowering or modifying the way that insurance is applied to semi-autonomous and computer controlled vehicles. We don't know any of that yet, but it's an idea that fundamentally could happen.


Source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PRIVACY POLICY

Privacy Policy Last updated: February 20, 2024 This Privacy Policy describes Our policies and procedures on the collection, use and disclosure of Your information when You use the Service and tells You about Your privacy rights and how the law protects You. We use Your Personal data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, You agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this Privacy Policy. This Privacy Policy has been created with the help of the Free Privacy Policy Generator . Interpretation and Definitions Interpretation The words of which the initial letter is capitalized have meanings defined under the following conditions. The following definitions shall have the same meaning regardless of whether they appear in singular or in plural. Definitions For the purposes of this Privacy Policy: Account means a unique account created for You to access our Service or parts of our Service. Affiliate means an entity that controls, is con...

Child-friendly Galaxy Tab 3 Kids listed in Korean brochure

We're no experts in Korean back-to-school literature, but it looks as if one retailer has tipped Samsung's plans a little early. If the documents above are legitimate, then the company will launch a kiddie-focused Galaxy Tab in short order. The Galaxy Tab 3 Kids is said to be an 8.5-inch slate with a 1.2GHz dual-core CPU, a 1,024 x 600 WSVGA display, 8GB storage, 1GB RAM and Jelly Bean. The company has also seen fit to include 802.11 a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth 3.0, a microSD card slot (no word on capacity) and a 4,000mAh battery. One thing that lends weight to the listing is that the device's model number is SM-T2105, which evleaks tersely described as a "Galaxy Tab for children" a month ago. There's more pictures over at the source, but not a single spec saying that this new device is resistant to jam-smeared fingers. Source: ENGADGET

Apple Rejected This Game To Keep You From Killing Your iPhone

Rejected by Apple for “encouraging behavior that could result in damage to the user’s device”, Carrot Pop's Send Me To Heaven arrives on Google Play, because no one cares if your Android device shatters on the pavement. "Throw your phone as high as you can" reads the primary instruction on S.M.T.H., a free game that measures the altitude of your device as it soars (hopefully) gracefully through the air. Catching it isn't a requirement, of course, but if you want your phone to remain intact long enough to compare your height on the leaderboards, it's highly recommended. It's up to the player to balance their competitive nature with the safety of their expensive gadgets, at least that's the idea. The concept has me brainstorming soft, portable landing materials to increase my chances of coming out unscathed during attempts at surpassing the 5.69 meter high score. I might just purchase phone insurance and an air cannon. Source: KOTAKU