Skip to main content

The One Thing The Original Pokemon Games Do Better Than The Newer Ones



After sitting through the Nintendo developer roundtable at E3, which featured Tsunekazu Ishihara and Junichi Masuda of The Pokemon Company and Game Freak respectively, it struck me: much has changed since the Pokemon: Red and Blue days. I'm not just talking about how there's a new fairy type now, either.

I'd like to think I'm not a slave to nostalgia; I think modern Pokemon games are great and I love where the new, sometimes absurd designs, are going. The early games hold a special place in my heart by virtue of being my introduction to the series, but that doesn't mean I think they're better. Don't get me wrong, I love them, but god, the early games were hugely imbalanced, I strained my eyes without a backlit screen, and the older sprites don't compare to the gorgeous color ones we have today. Still, there is one thing I wish hadn't changed from those days.

"Pokemon has always been about evolving alongside the hardware to better promote communication between players so they can enjoy the core elements of Pokemon—which are really collecting, battling and trading," Ishihara explained during a segment of the presentation that focused on connectivity in Pokemon games.

You can see that dedication to connectivity when you take a look at how innovative the idea of trading was in Pokemon Red and Blue: most uses of the Nintendo Game Link cable at the time focused on competitive play. The Game Link cable might've helped the fact that Game Boy bricks couldn't wirelessly connect with one another, but that cable fix did something wonderful: it forced you to connect with other people in person.

It's technology that encourages friendship—which is perfect for a game like Pokemon, which is also all about the power of friendship. The same can be said of the Game Boy Advance wireless adapter: it was a technological shortcoming that required players to be within a certain range, but it was that exact quality that encouraged players to bond with one another. That sort of interaction is a dying breed everywhere but tabletop gaming.

I still remember how damned difficult it was to trade or battle other trainers in those early days, though. There were always a bunch of people who had the games, but having the proper gear at the right time limited how often the average person got to play with other people. Compare that to the 80 million trades completed since Diamond and Pearl, which was when Pokemon games started to let players communicate over the internet. And now that Pokemon X & Y is introducing the Player Search System—which allows players to be always connected—collecting, battling and trading has never been easier. And that's exactly the "problem."

I won't say the days of Game Link and wireless adapters were convenient. Tech-wise, that stuff is archaic and inelegant compared to being a few taps away from communicating to other players. Yet, it's exactly that ease that has made communication with other players lose the weird charm of having to have all the cables, of having to know someone else that was willing to sit down with you and battle or trade face-to-face.

Collecting, battling and trading has never been easier. And that's exactly the "problem."

So no, I don't believe that having easy access to all Pokemon is inherently a good thing. How much does a Pokemon like Machamp, or any other Pokemon that only evolves when you trade it, mean to me when I can easily acquire it? I can still list out the Pokemon I traded in the older games; it was so rare then that any trades were memorable events. I still remember the first time I brought my Game Boy Color to school and traded my Charizard for a Pikachu—only to get my handheld confiscated because they weren't allowed in school. I've traded and battled dozens of times over that amount in the newer games, which is great—but I can barely recall any of it. That's because connecting from the comfort of your home rarely results in memorable stories.

If the Pokemon games are about fostering powerful relationships with my Pokemon and with other trainers, then the ease of trading is in direct opposition to that. My Pokemon have become easily tradeable data, critters which have more in common with the stock market than a puppy or friend. Most trainers online, meanwhile, are nothing more than a means to test my own strategic wit. Bonding not necessary.

I'll still use the PSS system, of course. I'm not going to pretend I don't take advantage of how easy the games make it for me now; I do. But for a franchise that is all about connectivity, it's a shame that that connectivity seems to have become less meaningful.


Source: KOTAKU

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PRIVACY POLICY

Privacy Policy Last updated: February 20, 2024 This Privacy Policy describes Our policies and procedures on the collection, use and disclosure of Your information when You use the Service and tells You about Your privacy rights and how the law protects You. We use Your Personal data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, You agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this Privacy Policy. This Privacy Policy has been created with the help of the Free Privacy Policy Generator . Interpretation and Definitions Interpretation The words of which the initial letter is capitalized have meanings defined under the following conditions. The following definitions shall have the same meaning regardless of whether they appear in singular or in plural. Definitions For the purposes of this Privacy Policy: Account means a unique account created for You to access our Service or parts of our Service. Affiliate means an entity that controls, is con...

Child-friendly Galaxy Tab 3 Kids listed in Korean brochure

We're no experts in Korean back-to-school literature, but it looks as if one retailer has tipped Samsung's plans a little early. If the documents above are legitimate, then the company will launch a kiddie-focused Galaxy Tab in short order. The Galaxy Tab 3 Kids is said to be an 8.5-inch slate with a 1.2GHz dual-core CPU, a 1,024 x 600 WSVGA display, 8GB storage, 1GB RAM and Jelly Bean. The company has also seen fit to include 802.11 a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth 3.0, a microSD card slot (no word on capacity) and a 4,000mAh battery. One thing that lends weight to the listing is that the device's model number is SM-T2105, which evleaks tersely described as a "Galaxy Tab for children" a month ago. There's more pictures over at the source, but not a single spec saying that this new device is resistant to jam-smeared fingers. Source: ENGADGET

Apple Rejected This Game To Keep You From Killing Your iPhone

Rejected by Apple for “encouraging behavior that could result in damage to the user’s device”, Carrot Pop's Send Me To Heaven arrives on Google Play, because no one cares if your Android device shatters on the pavement. "Throw your phone as high as you can" reads the primary instruction on S.M.T.H., a free game that measures the altitude of your device as it soars (hopefully) gracefully through the air. Catching it isn't a requirement, of course, but if you want your phone to remain intact long enough to compare your height on the leaderboards, it's highly recommended. It's up to the player to balance their competitive nature with the safety of their expensive gadgets, at least that's the idea. The concept has me brainstorming soft, portable landing materials to increase my chances of coming out unscathed during attempts at surpassing the 5.69 meter high score. I might just purchase phone insurance and an air cannon. Source: KOTAKU